Thanks for raising this, @chris_august7. For visibility, something similar has been posted here.
We appreciate the details you’ve provided. For the following Los Angeles targeting options, the first refers to the city in California and the second to Texas, as you mentioned.
{
"name":"Los Angeles, Los Angeles CA, CA, USA",
"country_code":"US",
"location_type":"CITIES",
"targeting_value":"3b77caf94bfc81fe",
"targeting_type":"LOCATION"
},
{
"name":"Los Angeles, US",
"country_code":"US",
"location_type":"CITIES",
"targeting_value":"019940ae78c7b3bc",
"targeting_type":"LOCATION"
}
We’re looking to update these name values so that they correctly return the state information.
For cases where the name is different for the same targeting_value—e.g., with 3b77caf94bfc81fe—know that the targeting_value will always correspond to a single entity. In other words, 3b77caf94bfc81fe will always refer to the city of Los Angeles in California, even if sometimes it’s returned as “Los Angeles, US.”
Again, looking to include the state information to make this clearer.
We don’t have a timeline yet for this fix, but will update this thread (and the other one) once we have more information.
Thanks!