Extended Tweet and Suffix

extended-tweet

#1

Hello,

I am currently working on the Extended Tweets and I wanted just to confirm something regarding the suffix.

From my understanding, the suffix is not something that we will be able to post. The value will be implied by the attached media. Am I correct?

Therefore if I were to publish a tweet with the following string :

@sam @aileen Check out this photo! pic.twitter.com/qeiq8en

The prefix would be "@sam @aileen ".
The content would be “Check out this photo! pic.twitter.com/qeiq8en” (the content includes the url).
The suffix would be null/empty.

Is this correct as per my understanding? Or does “pic.twitter.com/qeiq8en” needs to be automatically considered as a hidden suffix (and not counted in the content length)?

Thank you for your help.

PS : An extended tweet tag would be good to have on the forum.


#2

Someone?


#4

So I’ve added the extended-tweet tag as suggested, good idea.

If you include a URL in the text body of your Tweet then yes, it will be inside the 140.

The area that we’ve specified as a suffix would be included if you either use the forthcoming attachment_url parameter that we hint at in the documentation (this is intended for use with e.g. direct message deep links), or if a Tweet has attachments such as images or videos uploaded via the API. It will also include poll cards created via the official Twitter client apps.

In the example you’ve posted, which is based on our docs, you have a pic.twitter link - this is intended to show that an image has been attached via the API.

The other thing to note is that the @mentions are in the prefix here because the assumption that this is a Tweet in reply to another, and was created via the server lookup for metadata replies.

So in essence posting 140 characters of text without using any of the new parameters will continue to count as 140 characters. If an app “opts-in” to the new behaviours then there will be additional space within the 140 that would otherwise have been used by URLs and @mentions.


#5

Got it, thanks @andypiper.